Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Abu Lolo Mausoleum


Pirooz Nahavandi or Firuzan, also known as Abu Lolo (ابو لولو), was a Persian soldier who served under the Great Persian commander Rostam Farrokhzad. He was captured in the Battle of al-Qadisiyyah in 636 CE when the Persians were defeated by the Arab-Muslim army of Caliph Omar on the western bank of the Euphrates River. Like his fellow Iranians at that time he was a Zoroastrian.



Pirooz Nahavandi was taken in as a slave by an Egyptian named Mughira. Mughira told Pirooz Nahavandi that if he worked for him for 100 days and nights then he would set him free. Pirooz Nahavandi worked those 100 days and nights during which he started to learn about Islam to ingratiate himself with the conquerors of Iran so that he could get into a position where he could get near to Omar and thus assassinate him in revenge of the Sassanid Persian Empire. One morning when Omar was leading the morning prayer at Masjid al Nabawi, Pirooz Nahavandi approached the Caliph and stabbed him in the back and gutted him. According to some sources he committed suicide after he assassinated the caliphe.


 
Pirooz Nahavandi is regarded by many Iranians as a National Hero. Pirooz Nahavandi's tomb is located on the road from Kashan to Fin, constructed in an eleventh century distinctive Persian-Khwarezmi dynastic architectural style, consisted of a courtyard, porch and conical dome decorated with turquoise colored tiles, and painted ceilings. The original date of its construction is unknown, but in second half of fourteen century it was fully restored and a new tombstone was placed over his grave.


Controversy was caused recently when the International Union for Muslim Scholars called for the tomb to be destroyed, a request which was not well received by Iranians, even among those who still support the Islamic Republic, having being perceived as a specifically anti-Iranian act. In 2007 the tomb was being locked to visitors, as it was announced there is a plan for the shrine to be destroyed by the order of the Islamic Regime. However, a large crowd of Iranians gathered outside the governor's office to voice their objection regarding the closure and possible destruction of the Iranian heritage, and a shrine which was one of the symbols of Iranian resistance against the Arab invaders in 7th century CE.


61 comments:

  1. He is one of the national heroes and I do hope the Islamic Republic does not mess with that shrine - after all they are Iranians also are they not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He was just a coward who stabbed one of the greatest conquerors,this World has ever seen, in the back.There is no pride in stabbing someone in the back.Its infuriating that people have built a tomb over his grave and even some Muslims are supporting it.I feel ashamed the Muslims even regard that person who was the murderer of one of the esteemed Caliph of Islam.

      Delete
    2. ابو لولو شیره

      Delete
    3. Omar was a well know homosexual. He tried to use his power to exploit Abulolu and sodomize him. Abulolu killed Omar in self defence by cutting open Omar's belly.

      Delete
    4. If people are demanding demolition of his tomb because it hurts their feelings then the same action should be taken by them for the tomb of Muavia and Yazeed which are located in Syria because the former fought battle with the undisputed Caliph of Muslims Hazrate Ali a.s. and then signed a treaty with Imam Hasan a.s. in which it was clearly mentioned that Yazeed would not be made ruler after the death of Muavi but it was violated and Yazeed was given the throne which resulted in the incident of Kabrbala.

      Delete
  2. salam ber abu lo lo . GOD BLESS ABU LO LO

    ReplyDelete
  3. GO TO HELL ABU LO LO AND ALL HIS FOLLOWER.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I noticed some of the links to the pictures were broken. I have fixed that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. How can we say thus person a heroo who kill ameer ul momineen

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your facts are incorrect. He did not kill Ali.

      Delete
    2. Yes Accept him heero now
      Molana Fazalur Rahman (j. U. I)
      And Molana tariq jameel From Pakistan with Mutthada Majlis Amal
      Curse Ameen

      Delete
  6. Curse Curse and Curse on you and LoLo

    ReplyDelete
  7. The killing of a Muslim should not be glorified, come on now, this is a basic Islamic and fundamental human belief

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. His glorification had nothing to do with whether the victim was a Muslim or not.

      Delete
    2. What if god forbid the victim had been an ahlul bait.

      Delete
  8. why do we mix up religion , history, criminality.If iranians feel that being muslim is a blessing from god that get entitled to Janna, then they should not glorified abu lolo,. If they feel that arabs conquered Iran and feel national humilation , then they should say so and not mix reliigion with it and involve Ali with his escape, as Ali could not have done so at that time. He would not support a zorastrian against muslims and arabs. There were no Shias at that time, not even iranian muslims, iranians werw zorastrians. so iranians cooked uo story to involve in anti omar campaign. Abu lo lo had either a persnonal grudge for injustice or national grudge , or was motivated by Iranians to kill him for national defeat and humiliation. I have tried to analyse possible reasons for abu lolo to kill omar. In my opinion muslim clergy does not go by truth and go by preconceived ideas and aims and then build arguments to prove their point. Lastly, Historical facts are never true, they are cooked up, and one needs scientific methods to find the truth. therefore ,Iranians must learn that countries do get defeated, like germans and japan in WW2,but they live in peace with USA and euorope.Iranians must live in Todays world and not in the past,if they want to progress and live in peace. Tragedy with sunni and shia clergy is they want to make their sects as basis of relationshp and not the social basis of relationship. religion divides and creates hatred. Iranians and Arabs should get out of this mental attitude. Abu lol was a killer and a criminal for killing a human being and deserved punishment as individual. I hope i have explained it rationally. If Iranians curse Omar, they should know that they cannot befriend their co religiounists. That means they have no interersest in unity with muslims or to live in peace in this world. They seem to be confused how to live in this world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. His glorification has nothing to do with the religion of the person he killed.
      Do you believe all people who had killed a human being deserved punishment?

      Delete
    2. Abulolu killed Umar because Umar the great was a homosexual who tried to sodomize Abulolu.

      Delete
  9. abu lolo ek kuta hy or uske sab manne wale kuti ke bache hein is se age or kuch nahi kaha ja sakta.......Laaaaaaaaaannnnnnaaatttttt Beeshumaaaaaaar.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Agar Yeh Khanzeer Zinda Hota Tu Mein Iss Ko Marne Nai Deta Balke Iss Ko Maut K Liye B Tarpata Na Iss Ko Maarta Na Zinda Rakta Bs Azab Deta Aur Yeh ALLAH Se Dua Karta K ALLAH Muje Maut De Ya Muje Iss Azab Se Bacha Is Ko Itni Takhleef Deta K Yeh Zinda Lash Ho Kar Zindgi Guzarta Mafllooj Karta Khabees Ki Aulad Ko Najaiz Ki Aulad Ko Mera Dil Khoon K Ansu Ro Ra Hai Jb Is Khanzeer Ne Hazrat Umar Bin Khatab (R.A) Ko Shaheed Kiya Us Waqt Agar Mein Hota Iss Ko Aag Mein Daalta Qayamat K Azab Se Pele Iss Ko Azab Milta

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kis baat ka azaab? Omar nay abulolu keh saath ziadti (sodomy) karnay ki koshih Kee thee. Isi liay Abulolu killer Omar.

      Delete
    2. o mere bhai adaalat kis liay hai
      tuhmat lagaty huay tumhain sharm ani chahiay agar tum musalmaan ho to. is baat ki tasdeeq tum kaisy kro gy ?? apny baabon ki kitab sy. aur aik ghulaam kaafir ki baat pr tum yaqeen kro gy

      Delete
  12. abu lolo soor hai kuta nahin kutay ki badbi mat karo ye laeen khabees khanzeer hai

    ReplyDelete
  13. Replies
    1. چی داری هارت و پورت میکنی؟

      Delete
    2. Why? Abulolu only tried to defend himself from a sexual attack by Omar.

      Delete
    3. That is impossible...Visit some neutral shia scholar to find the truth

      Delete
  14. If Iran had 1000 like Pirooz Nahavandi, then those Arabs never could have destroyed Iran and raped our women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. mere bhai us time tum sab kaafir thy jb iran fatah hua tha aur ap ki aurtain agar jang main sath thi to wo bhi ghulam bna li thi

      Delete
  15. قیامت کے قائم ہونے تک ابو لولو مجوسی پر اللّٰہ، اس کے فرشتوں، انسانوں، جنات اور دیگر تمام مخلوقات کی طرف سے لعنت برستی رہے

    ReplyDelete
  16. There is another story which says that he disappeared after stabbing umar and was miraculously teleported to Iran but this is not a fairy tale eh

    ReplyDelete
  17. these iranians are nothing to do with islam, at the time of rasool s.a.w, kind of these people were there apparently looks like muslims, but always trying to back bite muslims. rasool s.a.w many times waned about this people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is unfair. There is definitely difference of opinion between to the two sects but that cannot be used to challenge their sincerity to Islam.

      Delete
    2. It is well known that Abulolu killed Omar because Omar was a flaming homosexual and tried to sodomize Abulolu.

      Delete
  18. It is well known that Abulolu killed Omar because Omar was a flaming homosexual and tried to sodomize Abulolu.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mr you are mentally disorder man may Allah curse you and make you fuel of hell lanat lanat Tara pa lanat

      Delete
  21. او ابولولو مجوسی کے ہم نام مجوسی مادرچود! تیری ہمشیرہ خود اپنی چوت پیش کرتی ہے اسکا مطلب یہ نہیں کہ سبھی ایسا کرتے ہیں۔ کسی مادرچود کے بچے تیرے پاس کوئی دلیل بھی یے اس بات کی؟ اگر کوئی کہے کہ علی بھی ہوموسیکشول تھے تو کیا لنڈ اکھاڑ لے گااسکا؟؟؟ علیؓ تو عمر سے سترہ سال چھوٹے تھے پھر تجھے پتہ کرنا چاہئے کہ کہیں وہ بھی انکا شکار نہ بنے ہوں۔ کسی مادرچود کے بجے

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Ibn Sa’ad:

      Narrated to us Ishaq bin Yusuf, from Muhammad bin Abdallah and Houdha bin Khalifa, who said: Narrated to us Ibn Awn, from Muhammad bin Sireen, who said:

      Umar ibn Khataab said: "There did not remain a thing in me from the practises of jahiliyya (era of ignorance), except that I don't care whom of the people I have penetrated (Nakh) or who of them have penetrated (Nakh) me."

      [Tabaqat Al Kubra. Vol. 3, Pg. # 269 H. 3714.]

      Delete
    3. ʾIbn al-Athīr also said: “The rawāfiḍh have claimed that our master, Omar, was a muḵḫannath (effeminate), they lied, except, he had an anal disease, which could be cured only by semen.”

      [al-Anwār al-nuʾmānīyya, vol. 1, pp. 71]

      Delete
    4. Umar basically had Gonorrhea, which is spread when semen (cum) gets inside anus or mouth. Gonorrhea can be passed even if the penis doesn’t go all the way in the anus.

      Umar contracted gonorrhea from having anal sex and oral sex.

      Delete
  22. Abu lulu ye wo nh jisne Harzat umar RA ko shaheed kiya tha common sense ki baat hai makkah me shadeed kiya tha Tab jahaz ya train to thi nahi or iran iski body laya kon ??? 3 months lagte the iran k safar me 3 months kisne is kutay ki body sambhali hogi .. Ye abu lulu feroz ka mazar hai meharbani kr k izat krein. wo abu lulu nahi ye

    ReplyDelete
  23. Shias are Najis...One word substitution

    ReplyDelete